Generic aerial editorial view of runways, taxiways, gates and parked aircraft.
Thinking European aviation · calendar year 2025

Data story · 30 August 2026

Europe Is Flying Again.
But the Old Hub Map Is Not.

Commercial aviation nearly recovered its flight count. Its connecting network did not.

6.9mEU commercial flight movements
98flight index · 2019 = 100
88hub-connectivity index · 2019 = 100

The convenient explanation

Flights are almost back. Therefore, the old hub system must be almost back too.

It is a plausible inference. It is also wrong.

The EU recorded 6,905,681 commercial flight movements in 2025, 3.8% more than in 2024 and 2.0% fewer than in 2019. One movement is one take-off or landing. It is not a passenger, a seat, or an emission.

Figure 01 · Recovery ladder

Flights recovered to 98. Hub connectivity recovered to 88.

Every measure is indexed to its own 2019 level. The common scale makes the recovery gap visible; it does not make the underlying concepts identical.

European aviation recovery ladderFive indexed measures compare 2025 with 2019. Flights are closest to recovery and hub connectivity furthest below.859095100Commercial flight movements98Direct connectivity95Indirect connectivity89Air connectivity91Hub connectivity88RECOVERY INDEX · EACH MEASURE’S 2019 LEVEL = 100
Commercial flight movements97.97 · −2.0% vs 2019
Exact values, definitions, and download
MeasureIndexChangeDefinition
Commercial flight movements97.97−2.0%All EU commercial IFR flight movements; one take-off or landing is one movement.
Direct connectivity95.00−5.0%Direct destinations weighted by flight frequency.
Indirect connectivity89.00−11.0%Destinations reachable via a hub, weighted by connection time and detour.
Air connectivity91.00−9.0%Direct plus indirect connectivity.
Hub connectivity88.00−12.0%Connecting flights facilitated at a hub, weighted by time and detour quality.
Download exact CSV

Sources: Eurostat/Eurocontrol and SEO Amsterdam Economics / ACI Europe. Calendar year 2025.

Act I · Read the unit

Movement recovery and network recovery are different claims.

Across the 476 airports in the ACI Europe and SEO study, direct connectivity remained 5% below 2019. Indirect connectivity was 11% lower. Hub connectivity—the quantity and quality of connecting opportunities an airport can facilitate—was still 12% below.

Act II · The map changes

The airport evidence rejects a simple hub-decline story.

Istanbul reached +13% direct and +59% hub connectivity. Athens reached +24% and +92%. Frankfurt remained 11% below in direct and 21% below in hub connectivity.

Rome is the useful counterexample: direct connectivity rose 3%, while hub connectivity fell 26%.

Hub power did not disappear. It moved.
Figure 02 · Airport evidence

Hub power did not disappear. It moved.

The twenty leading direct-connectivity airports occupy four different recovery states. Position compares change, not score size.

Direct and hub connectivity changeQuadrant scatter for twenty airports, with zero reference lines and Frankfurt selected.−20%0%+20%−50%0%+50%+100%ISTAMSLHRFRACDGMADBCNMUCFCOATHPMILGWSAWCPHVIEDUBZRHORYLISAYTHUB CONNECTIVITY CHANGE ↑DIRECT CONNECTIVITY CHANGE →
FRA · GermanyDirect −11% · hub −21%
Exact top-twenty values and download
RankAirportDirect changeHub changeGap
1IST+13%+59%+46 pp
2AMS−4%−17%−13 pp
3LHR−2%−5%−3 pp
4FRA−11%−21%−10 pp
5CDG−7%−10%−3 pp
6MAD−3%−2%+1 pp
7BCN+1%+5%+4 pp
8MUC−15%−12%+3 pp
9FCO+3%−26%−29 pp
10ATH+24%+92%+68 pp
11PMI+11%+93%+82 pp
12LGW−7%−23%−16 pp
13SAW+14%+75%+61 pp
14CPH−1%+7%+8 pp
15VIE−8%−32%−24 pp
16DUB+8%+30%+22 pp
17ZRH−2%−5%−3 pp
18ORY−4%−44%−40 pp
19LIS+4%+8%+4 pp
20AYT+29%+139%+110 pp
Download exact CSV

Source: SEO Amsterdam Economics / Airports Council International - Europe (ACI EUROPE), 2025 annex.

Figure 03 · Frankfurt icon wall

One ranking. Four different signals.

Scores are weighted network measures. Compare rank and change—not the direct score with the hub score.

RankAirportDirectHub
01ISTTurkey+13%+59%
02AMSNetherlands−4%−17%
03LHRUnited Kingdom−2%−5%
04FRAGermany−11%−21%
05CDGFrance−7%−10%
06MADSpain−3%−2%
07BCNSpain+1%+5%
08MUCGermany−15%−12%
09FCOItaly+3%−26%
10ATHGreece+24%+92%
Exact scores, changes, and download
RankAirportDirect scoreDirect changeHub scoreHub change
1IST5059+13%66021+59%
2AMS4691−4%48119−17%
3LHR4588−2%31968−5%
4FRA4523−11%61977−21%
5CDG4436−7%42547−10%
6MAD3833−3%22501−2%
7BCN3466+1%4473+5%
8MUC3428−15%30068−12%
9FCO3381+3%10957−26%
10ATH2936+24%6754+92%
Download exact CSV

Source: SEO Amsterdam Economics / Airports Council International - Europe (ACI EUROPE), 2025 annex.

Signature interaction · Put the hub story on trial

Choose an airport. Judge the same evidence.

Flights, direct links, hub connectivity, seats, and passengers remain separate. The card changes; the evidence boundary does not.

Selected case · Germany

Frankfurt/Main FRA

Direct and hub connectivity are both below 2019. The old network is not back.

Flight movements89.6index · 2019 = 100
Direct connectivity−11%change vs 2019
Hub connectivity−21%change vs 2019
Passenger flights−11.7%
Seats per flight+0.7%
Implied occupancy+0.5 pp
Passengers−10.6%
Share this exact evidence state.
Figure 04 · Airport size

Medium airports regained direct links. Small airports did not.

Direct access and indirect network recovery do not move together. Focus, hover, or tap a segment for its exact comparison.

Medium airports · 1-10m passengersDirect +2% · indirect −9% · total −5%
Exact segment values and download
SegmentDirectIndirectTotal air
Major−3%−6%−5%
Mega−3%−6%−5%
Large−4%−12%−10%
Medium+2%−9%−5%
Small−8%−16%−13%
Download exact CSV

Source: ACI Europe Airport Industry Connectivity Report 2025, Chart 5. Calendar year 2025 versus 2019.

Act IV · Selective bypass

Medium-airport gains do not amount to a general bypass revolution.

Medium airports were 2% above 2019 in direct connectivity, consistent with selective new access. Their indirect connectivity remained 9% lower. Small airports remained below 2019 on every measure.

Act V · Airline strategy

The clearer structural split is between business models.

Direct connectivity supplied by low-cost carriers was 19% above 2019. Full-service-carrier connectivity was 15% below. Aircraft technology may matter; airline network strategy moved first in the public evidence.

Figure 05 · Airline supply

The clearer split is between airline business models.

All-direct connectivity changed in opposite directions for low-cost and full-service carriers. Focus, hover, or tap a row for its exact change.

Low-cost carriersAll-direct connectivity +19% versus 2019
Exact business-model values and download
ModelAll-direct changeIntra-Europe share 20192025
Low-cost carriers+19%32%39%
Full-service carriers−15%
All carriers−5%
Download exact CSV

Source: ACI Europe 2025 report, Chart 20 and page 27. Calendar year 2025 versus 2019.

Act VI · Frankfurt on the evidence bench

A flight is not a seat. A seat is not a passenger.

The objection to counting flights is correct. Fewer flights can carry more seats, and fuller aircraft can carry more passengers. At Frankfurt, the capacity repair does not reverse the result.

Passenger flights remained 11.7% below 2019. Seats per flight rose only 0.7%. Passenger numbers remained 10.6% lower.
Figure 06 · Frankfurt capacity anatomy

Frankfurt’s gap is still mainly a frequency gap.

A flight is not a seat. A seat is not a passenger. Four measures keep the capacity repair honest.

Airport capacity anatomyFour zero-centered measures compare Frankfurt with Madrid, Munich, Rome and Copenhagen.Passenger flights−11.7%Seats per flight+0.7%Implied occupancy+0.5 ppPassengers−10.6%CHANGE FROM 2019 TO 2025 · OWN UNIT PER ROW
Frankfurt/Main · FRAFlights −11.7% · passengers −10.6%
Exact capacity values, definitions, and download
AirportPassenger flightsSeats / flightOccupancyPassengers
Frankfurt/Main−11.7%+0.7%+0.5 pp−10.6%
Madrid-Barajas+2.3%+8.1%+2.5 pp+13.8%
Munich−19.5%+7.2%+3.7 pp−9.6%
Rome Fiumicino+1.4%+7.6%+5.6 pp+17.0%
Copenhagen−2.8%+5.5%+3.4 pp+7.2%
Download exact CSV

Source: Eurostat avia_tf_aca; author calculations. Athens is excluded because 2019 available-seat data are not reported.

Figure 07 · Evidence boundary

The aircraft claim is plausible. It is not identified.

The public evidence describes the shift. It cannot isolate the A220 or A321XLR as its cause.

ObservedAirport direct and hub connectivity in 2025ACI/SEO NetScan annex · latest common year 2025
ObservedFlights, seats and passengers by airportEurostat avia_tf_aca · latest common year 2025
LaggedAirport-pair flights, seats and passengersEurostat avia_par_* · latest common year 2024
Not isolatableA220-specific activityEurostat aircraft taxonomy · latest common year 2025
Not isolatableA321XLR-specific activityEurostat aircraft taxonomy · latest common year 2025
Commercial data requiredPassenger itinerary and connecting airportNo complete public EU dataset · latest common year
Exact evidence ledger and download
TestPublic sourceLatest yearAircraft causality?Status
Airport direct and hub connectivity in 2025ACI/SEO NetScan annex2025NoObserved
Flights, seats and passengers by airportEurostat avia_tf_aca2025NoObserved
Airport-pair flights, seats and passengersEurostat avia_par_*2024NoLagged
A220-specific activityEurostat aircraft taxonomy2025NoNot isolatable
A321XLR-specific activityEurostat aircraft taxonomy2025NoNot isolatable
Passenger itinerary and connecting airportNo complete public EU datasetPotentially, with designCommercial data required
Download exact CSV

Sources: ACI/SEO, Eurostat and EUROCONTROL public documentation; reviewed 30 August 2026.

Act VII · The causal boundary

What about the A220 and A321XLR?

The mechanism is plausible: smaller, longer-range aircraft can lower the capacity threshold for a direct route. But Eurostat does not isolate the A220 cleanly, combines A321 variants, and public airport-pair data stop at 2024.

Verdict · cleared to publish

Europe is becoming less dependent on some traditional hubs, on some routes, through some airline models.

That is materially different from saying that hubs are obsolete.

  1. Flight activity recovered faster than connecting-network quality.
  2. Hub power shifted toward airports such as Istanbul and Athens while Frankfurt stayed below its 2019 position.
  3. Medium airports regained direct connectivity, but small airports did not.
  4. The aircraft mechanism is plausible, but not identified by the public data.
The aggregate recovered. The map changed.

Methods · concise by design

Three evidence families. No blended denominator.

Eurostat counts commercial IFR movements, passenger flights, seats, and passengers. SEO/ACI NetScan measures weighted direct, indirect, total-air, and hub connectivity. Every 2025 recovery index compares one measure with its own 2019 level.

FlightsOne take-off or landing
SeatsAvailable for sale on passenger flights
ConnectivityWeighted network access, not traffic
Download methods
Published 30 August 2026Schym.de · Research