Chemical Industry Radar · August 2026 · V3

The rebound that ran through Hormuz

August produced the strongest sentiment jump in four years. It did not produce a German chemical recovery.

Verdict

The rebound passed the orders and earnings tests; it failed utilisation, energy and investment.

Published 2026-09-01Cutoff 2026-09-01 · 05:00 UTCConfidence 0.84 · high20 source endpoints
Mood index3.4/ 10 · +0.2 MoM

Utilisation73.2%vs 80.4% long-run

Power126.85/MWh · +20.3% MoM

production orders sales productivity2026-06VCI Chemiebarometer
trade2026-H1VCI Chemiebarometer
producer prices2026-07Destatis and VCI
sentiment2026-08ifo Institute
energy2026-08-31Energy-Charts and Yahoo Finance
corporate and policy events2026-08-31company and institutional releases
Act 02 · Mechanism

A supply shock wearing the clothes of recovery.

Asian supply failures linked to the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz redirected demand and pricing power toward European producers. Installed German capacity became useful because competing capacity became unavailable.

August produced the strongest improvement in German chemical-industry sentiment in four years. It did not produce a German chemical recovery.

The test is conversion: whether orders enter production, utilisation, hiring and domestic growth investment after supply elsewhere normalises.

  1. 01 · DisruptionAsian supply failedHormuz constrained competing output.
  2. 02 · SubstitutionOrders moved westEuropean installed capacity regained pricing power.
  3. 03 · CaptureEarnings reactedCompany guidance improved before volumes did.
  4. 04 · TestFactories must followOutput, utilisation and investment remain decisive.
Figure 01

Sentiment snapped back; expectations still ended below zero

ifo balance points · July and August 2026

business climate−26.3−2.4current situation−14.6+11.6expectations−37.2−15.5export expectations−22.7+10.1

  • business climate, July: −26.3 points. Before the August supply-substitution shock.
  • business climate, August: −2.4 points. +23.9 points from July.
  • current situation, July: −14.6 points. Before the August supply-substitution shock.
  • current situation, August: +11.6 points. +26.2 points from July.
  • expectations, July: −37.2 points. Before the August supply-substitution shock.
  • expectations, August: −15.5 points. +21.7 points from July.
  • export expectations, July: −22.7 points. Before the August supply-substitution shock.
  • export expectations, August: +10.1 points. +32.8 points from July.
Inspect exact values
IndicatorJulyAugustChange
business climate−26.3−2.4+23.9 pts
current situation−14.6+11.6+26.2 pts
expectations−37.2−15.5+21.7 pts
export expectations−22.7+10.1+32.8 pts
Source ifo Institute, 28 August 2026.Boundary Seasonally adjusted survey balances; the jump was linked to foreign supply disruption.
Figure 02

The index recovered from May, but remains below neutral

Published Mood Index · October 2025 to August 2026

Neutral 5103.0112.5122.3012.8023.1031.8041.7051.6062.6073.2083.4

  • 2025-10: 3.0 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2025-11: 2.5 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2025-12: 2.3 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-01: 2.8 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-02: 3.1 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-03: 1.8 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-04: 1.7 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-05: 1.6 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-06: 2.6 / 10. legacy published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-07: 3.2 / 10. 2.0 published index; no smoothing or backfill.
  • 2026-08: 3.4 / 10. 3.0 published index; no smoothing or backfill.
Inspect exact values
MonthIndexVersion
2025-103.0legacy
2025-112.5legacy
2025-122.3legacy
2026-012.8legacy
2026-023.1legacy
2026-031.8legacy
2026-041.7legacy
2026-051.6legacy
2026-062.6legacy
2026-073.22.0
2026-083.43.0
Source Schym Chemical Industry Radar edition registry.Boundary Published history is frozen; no smoothing or component backfill.
Orders → output

The conversion gap remains open.

orders+3.7% YTD+6.2% y/y · −2.7% m/m

production−2.7% YTD+0.1% y/y · −1.8% m/m

sales+1.5% YTD+9.8% y/y · −1.9% m/m

Act 03 · System

The headline moved little. The system rotated hard.

Orders and earnings gained weight. Energy took much of it back. Investment stayed pinned near the floor.

Demand signalOrders+1.5 score pointsForeign substitution improved the order book.
Operating gateUtilisation73.2%7.2 points below long-run.
Cost vetoEnergy−1.0 score pointPower rose 20.3% month on month.
Renewal testInvestment1.5 / 10Domestic growth capital stayed scarce.
Figure 03

Orders and earnings improved; energy gave much of it back

Component score, 0–10 · July versus August

Production & utilisation2.5Orders & demand5.5Profitability & revisions7.0Energy & feedstocks1.5Investment & Standort1.5Employment & productivity3.0Trade & competitiveness3.5Innovation5.0Regulation & policy3.0Financial expectations6.0

  • Production & utilisation, July: 2.5. 15% index weight.
  • Production & utilisation, August: 2.5. 0.0 point change; Chemical production remained 2.7% lower year to date and capacity utilisation was only 73.2%.
  • Orders & demand, July: 4.0. 10% index weight.
  • Orders & demand, August: 5.5. +1.5 point change; Chemical orders, manufacturing PMI and export expectations improved, partly through temporary substitution.
  • Profitability & revisions, July: 6.0. 10% index weight.
  • Profitability & revisions, August: 7.0. +1.0 point change; Evonik, Brenntag, Merck and Henkel reported material earnings or guidance improvements.
  • Energy & feedstocks, July: 2.5. 15% index weight.
  • Energy & feedstocks, August: 1.5. −1.0 point change; Power, gas, producer prices and Rhine logistics costs deteriorated sharply.
  • Investment & Standort, July: 1.5. 15% index weight.
  • Investment & Standort, August: 1.5. 0.0 point change; Domestic projects focused on logistics resilience and pilots while growth capacity continued to expand abroad.
  • Employment & productivity, July: 2.5. 10% index weight.
  • Employment & productivity, August: 3.0. +0.5 point change; Productivity and unit labour costs improved, but companies continued to expect job cuts.
  • Trade & competitiveness, July: 3.0. 10% index weight.
  • Trade & competitiveness, August: 3.5. +0.5 point change; EU exports supported the surplus, but US and China exports remained negative and Germany lagged global production.
  • Innovation, July: 4.5. 5% index weight.
  • Innovation, August: 5.0. +0.5 point change; Electrolysis, digital twins, lipid delivery and packaging substitution expanded the opportunity set, with limited German scale-up capture.
  • Regulation & policy, July: 3.0. 5% index weight.
  • Regulation & policy, August: 3.0. 0.0 point change; PPWR harmonisation improved clarity while PFAS, circularity and reporting obligations increased near-term compliance work.
  • Financial expectations, July: 6.0. 5% index weight.
  • Financial expectations, August: 6.0. 0.0 point change; The equal-weighted basket gained 2.6%, but dispersion and provisional month-end data argued against an upgrade.
Inspect exact values
ComponentWeightJulyAugustDeltaConfidence
Production & utilisation15%2.52.50.095%
Orders & demand10%4.05.5+1.590%
Profitability & revisions10%6.07.0+1.090%
Energy & feedstocks15%2.51.5−1.092%
Investment & Standort15%1.51.50.068%
Employment & productivity10%2.53.0+0.580%
Trade & competitiveness10%3.03.5+0.595%
Innovation5%4.55.0+0.572%
Regulation & policy5%3.03.00.085%
Financial expectations5%6.06.00.075%
Source Schym component scoring ledger, 1 September 2026.Boundary Frozen weights; contributions reconcile to 3.425, rounded only for publication.
Figure 04

Germany trails the world by 4.2 points and China by 7.3

Chemical production, year-to-date change

China+4.6%Spain+3.3%World+1.5%France+1.0%India+0.6%Poland+0.1%South Korea−0.2%EU27−1.6%United States−2.1%Germany−2.7%Italy−3.3%Japan−4.2%Austria−4.7%Netherlands−6.0%Singapore−8.4%

  • China: +4.6%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Spain: +3.3%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • World: +1.5%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • France: +1.0%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • India: +0.6%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Poland: +0.1%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • South Korea: −0.2%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • EU27: −1.6%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • United States: −2.1%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-07.
  • Germany: −2.7%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Italy: −3.3%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Japan: −4.2%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Austria: −4.7%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Netherlands: −6.0%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
  • Singapore: −8.4%. Chemical production year to date; latest 2026-06.
Inspect exact values
GeographyChangeLatest
World+1.5%2026-06
EU27−1.6%2026-06
Germany−2.7%2026-06
France+1.0%2026-06
Italy−3.3%2026-06
Netherlands−6.0%2026-06
Spain+3.3%2026-06
Poland+0.1%2026-06
Austria−4.7%2026-06
United States−2.1%2026-07
China+4.6%2026-06
Japan−4.2%2026-06
South Korea−0.2%2026-06
India+0.6%2026-06
Singapore−8.4%2026-06
Source VCI World Chemistry Report, August 2026.Boundary Latest observation is June for most geographies and July for the United States.
Figure 05

Power and gas both rose; electricity carried the sharper shock

Separate aligned scales · EUR/MWh

DE-LU day-ahead powerJul 105.5Aug 126.9EUR/MWh · separate scaleTTF front-month proxyJul 54.4Aug 62.1EUR/MWh · separate scale

  • DE-LU day-ahead power, July: EUR 105.47/MWh. Interval counts are not comparable with pre-October-2025 hourly data; averages are comparable.
  • DE-LU day-ahead power, August: EUR 126.85/MWh. Observed range EUR -18.49–487.38/MWh. Interval counts are not comparable with pre-October-2025 hourly data; averages are comparable.
  • TTF front-month proxy, July: EUR 54.37/MWh. Front-month daily-close proxy; not identical to the July Cbonds settlement-average series.
  • TTF front-month proxy, August: EUR 62.14/MWh. Observed range EUR 52.40–69.81/MWh. Front-month daily-close proxy; not identical to the July Cbonds settlement-average series.
Inspect exact values
SeriesJulyAugustMoMRange
Power105.47126.85+20.3%-18.49487.38
TTF proxy54.3762.14+14.3%52.4069.81
Source Energy-Charts and Yahoo Finance, 1–31 August 2026.Boundary TTF is a front-month daily-close proxy and not identical to July’s Cbonds series.
Figure 06

Europe carried the surplus while the US and China weakened

German chemical exports and imports · y/y, January–June 2026

EU+4.0+4.4United States−13.2−4.1China−2.5+2.6India+6.2+1.9Japan−5.3−16.0South Korea+1.5+5.7Asia−3.0−3.1Americas−7.1−3.6

  • EU exports: +4.0% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • EU imports: +4.4% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • United States exports: −13.2% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • United States imports: −4.1% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • China exports: −2.5% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • China imports: +2.6% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • India exports: +6.2% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • India imports: +1.9% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • Japan exports: −5.3% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • Japan imports: −16.0% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • South Korea exports: +1.5% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • South Korea imports: +5.7% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • Asia exports: −3.0% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • Asia imports: −3.1% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
  • Americas exports: −7.1% y/y. German chemical exports, January–June 2026.
  • Americas imports: −3.6% y/y. German chemical imports, January–June 2026.
Inspect exact values
GeographyExports y/yImports y/y
EU+4.0%+4.4%
United States−13.2%−4.1%
China−2.5%+2.6%
India+6.2%+1.9%
Japan−5.3%−16.0%
South Korea+1.5%+5.7%
Asia−3.0%−3.1%
Americas−7.1%−3.6%
Source VCI Chemiebarometer, 25 August 2026.Boundary Exports and imports are parallel measures, not temporal endpoints.
Figure 07

Guidance improved broadly, but the quality of recovery diverged

Company-reported Q2 or H1 metrics · definitions retained

Company-reported Q2 or H1 evidence; definitions differ and are not aggregated.
CompanyReported signalGuidanceCash contextRadar readingConfidence
Evonik2026-08-05Adjusted EBITDA +24.0%volume and pricing, including Asian supply disruptionEUR 2.0-2.2bn adjusted EBITDAEUR 49mcyclical gain with structural cost defence90%
Brenntag2026-08-12Operating EBITDA +41.0%pricing discipline, commercial execution and cost savingsEUR 1.35-1.45bn operating EBITDAEUR 4mexecution-led gain with subdued EMEA demand85%
Merck KGaA2026-08-06EBITDA pre, organic +9.3%structural growth pocketsfull-year guidance upgradedNot separately reportedstructural growth pockets95%
Henkel2026-08-06Organic sales +3.2%portfolio strength with geographic concentration1.5-3.5% group organic growth; 2.0-4.0% Adhesive TechnologiesNot separately reportedportfolio strength with geographic concentration95%
Bayer2026-08-04EBITDA before specials +1.9%operational progress with balance-sheet constraintcurrency-adjusted group outlook confirmed; lower debt targetEUR -371moperational progress with balance-sheet constraint95%
LANXESS2026-08-12Sales +6.5%volume improvement without durable core-market recoveryEUR 450-550m EBITDA pre exceptionalsNot separately reportedvolume improvement without durable core-market recovery80%
Source Company releases and identified secondary sources, August 2026.Boundary Group and segment metrics are heterogeneous and are not aggregated.
Act 04 · Diagnosis

Adaptation at home. Optionality abroad.

The type and geography of capital spending distinguish resilience from renewal.

positive indirect

BASF

Logistics hub upgrade · EUR 51m

Ludwigshafen · Germany · 65% confidence
positive small

Sunfire/BASF

1.3 MW SOEC pilot construction

BASF site · Germany · 80% confidence
none

Evonik

GMP lipid manufacturing facility · CAD 150m

Vancouver · Canada · 85% confidence
unclear

Henkel

Five-acquisition growth programme; four closed · EUR 5bn

Global · Multiple · 95% confidence
none

BASF/NEO Corporate

Personal-care innovation partnership

Asia-Pacific · Multiple · 80% confidence
Cyclical ledgerimproving

Orders, sentiment, pricing and several company accounts improved.

Structural ledgerdeteriorating

Capacity, energy, logistics and domestic growth investment did not.

Recovery qualitytemporary supply substitution

The advantage disappears if supply elsewhere normalises first.

Electronics and data centres+1.5broadening
Life science and pharma tools+1.5structural
Agriculture+0.5earnings-led
Packaging and consumer goods+0.5partly temporary
Automotive−0.5mixed
Construction−1.0weak
Basic chemicals−1.5weak physical, strong price
Act 05 · Decision

The central case is relief without structural repair.

The scenarios are editorial ranges with observable triggers—not statistical confidence intervals.

Figure 08

The central case is relief without structural repair

Three-month Mood Index range · editorial probability

Temporary substitution55% editorial3.24.0Genuine volume recovery20% editorial3.84.6Reversal after normalisation25% editorial2.43.2Mood Index, 0–10

  • Temporary substitution: 3.2–4.0 / 10. 55% editorial probability. Supply disruption sustains orders and margins while inventories absorb much of demand.
  • Genuine volume recovery: 3.8–4.6 / 10. 20% editorial probability. Orders broaden into production, investment and hiring.
  • Reversal after normalisation: 2.4–3.2 / 10. 25% editorial probability. Asian supply returns while German energy and logistics costs stay high.
Inspect exact values
ScenarioProbabilityRangeMechanism
Temporary substitution55%3.24Supply disruption sustains orders and margins while inventories absorb much of demand.
Genuine volume recovery20%3.84.6Orders broaden into production, investment and hiring.
Reversal after normalisation25%2.43.2Asian supply returns while German energy and logistics costs stay high.
Source Schym scenario assessment, 1 September 2026.Boundary Whiskers are judgemental ranges, not sampling or model confidence intervals.
September watchlist

Does the improvement enter the factory?

  1. 01chemical production month-on-month and year-on-year
  2. 02capacity utilisation above 75% and then 76%
  3. 03export orders after easing of Hormuz disruption
  4. 04German power below EUR 100/MWh
  5. 05TTF below EUR 50/MWh
  6. 06Rhine gauges and barge load factors
  7. 07guidance breadth beyond pricing beneficiaries
  8. 08new German growth-capacity final investment decisions
  9. 09chemical employment plans
Decision matrix

What can move the verdict?

risk · high probability

Asian supply normalises before German costs fall

high impact

risk · medium high probability

Power and gas remain above July levels

high impact

risk · medium probability

Rhine disruption persists

high impact

risk · high probability

Further job and site restructuring

medium high impact

risk · medium probability

US and China export weakness deepens

high impact

opportunity · medium probability

Infrastructure spending converts into chemical orders

medium high impact

opportunity · high probability

Electronics and life science scale further

medium high impact

opportunity · high probability

PPWR accelerates substitution chemistry

medium impact

opportunity · low medium probability

Energy-resilience pilots reach final investment decisions

high impact

Schym’s Take

The German chemical industry did not imagine August’s improvement. Orders did arrive. Prices did rise. Several companies did earn more money. The mistake would be to confuse the place where the profit appeared with the place where the recovery originated.

A durable recovery would look less dramatic and more boring: higher utilisation, predictable energy, domestic growth projects, stable employment expectations, and export gains that survive the reopening of other suppliers.

The index rises because the cycle is no longer uniformly hostile. It stops at 3.4 because the Standort is still waiting for evidence.
Methodology, limitations and no-data register

Immutable core

  • exact calendar month
  • Germany-centred with explicit global benchmarks
  • immutable weights and published history
  • observation date separated from publication date
  • fact separated from inference
  • cyclical separated from structural
  • company success separated from sector recovery
  • announced policy separated from implemented policy
  • investment and innovation tested for domestic capture
  • method breaks versioned
  • scenario triggers made falsifiable

Known limitations

  • Official chemical statistics lag by six to eight weeks.
  • Capacity utilisation is Q3-to-date survey evidence, not an August production measure.
  • TTF is a front-month proxy and not identical to the prior Cbonds average.
  • Electricity interval counts are not comparable with pre-October-2025 hourly counts.
  • Corporate figures mix groups, segments and different business models.
  • Scenario probabilities are editorial judgements.

No-data register

July or August 2026 official German chemical productionnot available at cutoffJune used as latest hard-data vintage

August 31 German company equity closesnot populated in source feed at cutoffAugust 28 observations labelled provisional

Major German chemical incidentsnone verified from primary sources within cutoffreported as a no-data finding, not absence of incidents

New verified German chemical plant closure announced in Augustnone identified in reviewed primary sourcesno event added

TTF methodology continuitymethod breakfront-month proxy tagged and not backfilled

The edition resolves 20 distinct source endpoints across a 77-row evidence ledger. Source URLs, observation dates, units, periods, confidence and method notes are validated at build time and retained beside their published figures.